Smithsonian’s Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion Shines Amid Recent Challenges

The Smithsonian Institution maintains its commitment to diversity and inclusion despite challenges from federal directives affecting DEI initiatives in the arts sector.

Share this post:

Impact of Recent Changes in Arts Sector

Recent shifts in the arts sector have drawn attention to the Smithsonian Institution, particularly in light of the National Gallery of Art’s decision to end its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

This move came on the heels of a presidential executive order aimed at dismantling federally funded DEI programs.

Naturally, this raises concerns about how, or if, the Smithsonian—which oversees an impressive array of 21 museums covering topics from American art to African American history—will react to these changes.

Funding Diversity at the Smithsonian

A memo from the United States Office of Personnel Management conveyed instructions to place DEI office employees on paid leave before a specified deadline.

This action aims to wrap up all diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) efforts across federal institutions, stirring fresh debates around governance and funding in these organizations.

Yet, the Smithsonian’s operating framework sets it apart.

Founded by Congress in 1846, thanks to a substantial bequest from English scientist James Smithson, it functions as an independent entity rather than a typical government agency.

Its governance involves a Board of Regents, composed of members from the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, positioning the Smithsonian as a trust instrumentality of the United States.

Funding for the Smithsonian is notably diverse.

According to its 2023 annual report, about half of its financial resources come from federal appropriations, while the other half is fueled by donations, business ventures, and income from its endowment.

This blend of funding suggests that while certain operations might need to adjust to the new directives—especially those relying on federal funds—much of the Smithsonian’s programming could persist in pursuing its vital missions, regardless of the executive order’s influence.

Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion

It’s crucial to note that the National Gallery of Art is separate from the Smithsonian.

Nevertheless, its recent choice to pause DEI initiatives has triggered concerns about possible effects on other federally funded institutions.

Still, the Smithsonian’s online platforms continue to showcase roles dedicated to diversity and inclusion, signifying a commitment to these principles.

Furthermore, the Smithsonian Affiliations program actively promotes the integration of diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion within its core narrative.

Although the Smithsonian has refrained from commenting publicly on the status of its DEI funding or personnel, the continued emphasis on these important values within its framework remains encouraging for advocates of diversity and inclusion.

As discussions progress, the Smithsonian stands as a beacon of hope and inspiration, showcasing its mission of unity through its varied and rich offerings.